tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5945843206427351559.post9034515934267903294..comments2024-01-25T14:51:13.377-05:00Comments on Gamso - For the Defense: Judge - not much longerJeff Gamsohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09869425697771419546noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5945843206427351559.post-55007238651270366832009-08-06T21:16:10.890-04:002009-08-06T21:16:10.890-04:00Actually, I fear she's a lot too prosecution. ...Actually, I fear she's a lot too prosecution. Her track record in criminal cases (and quasi-criminal ones) is downright depressing. <br /><br />So now there's someone who actually practiced law - but never on behalf of the accused. Who was a harsh sentencer (at least in white collar cases), and who seems deeply deferential to law enforcement.<br /><br />Another prosecutor on the bench is far from what we need.Jeff Gamsohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09869425697771419546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5945843206427351559.post-52420998080425035222009-08-06T20:38:12.690-04:002009-08-06T20:38:12.690-04:00I'm really quite nervous about her. The exclu...I'm really quite nervous about her. The exclusionary rule, in all its various incarnations, is under attack. I worry that the conservative wing is ready to do away with it. I don't think I'll breathe a sigh of relief until she votes in a case affirming the exclusion of evidence that was obtained in violation of the constitution. I don't have any particular reason for thinking she could go that route; I'm just paranoid and I worry she's a little too pro-prosecution.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.com